Sequentur Blog

Helping you stay ahead of IT challenges

Real-world IT knowledge from engineers solving problems every day.

Practical IT knowledge for businesses that can’t afford downtime

Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace for Small Business

Workspace,Office,Stationary,Workplace,Concept

Choosing between Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace is one of the first technology decisions a small business makes, and it is one of the hardest to reverse. Both platforms provide email, file storage, video meetings, and collaboration tools. Both work in a browser. Both have mobile apps. On the surface, they look interchangeable. They are not.

The differences are in the details – how each platform handles offline work, security controls, admin management, device policies, and the ecosystem of tools your business will build around it. This guide compares them honestly, covering the areas that actually matter for small businesses and the trade-offs that marketing pages gloss over. The goal is not to declare a winner. It is to help you figure out which platform fits how your business works.

Email and calendar

Both platforms provide business email with custom domains, shared calendars, and 50 GB mailboxes (Google gives 30 GB on Business Starter, but 2 TB pooled on Standard and above). For basic email, the experience is comparable. The differences show up in features that matter as your business grows.

Microsoft 365 uses Exchange Online for email, which means full support for shared mailboxes, distribution lists, Microsoft 365 Groups, mail-enabled security groups, and complex mail flow rules. Exchange has deep support for delegation (send as, send on behalf), room and resource mailboxes, and transport rules that route or modify mail based on conditions. If your business needs shared mailboxes for departments like info@ or support@, Exchange handles this natively and shared mailboxes are free – they do not require a license. The different types of mailbox and group options give you flexibility, though they also add complexity.

Google Workspace uses Gmail, which most people are already familiar with. Gmail’s search is excellent, the interface is clean, and labels offer a different organizational model than folders. Google Groups handle distribution lists and shared mailboxes, but the feature set is simpler than Exchange. Google’s collaborative inbox covers basic shared mailbox needs, but it does not match Exchange for send-as support, auto-mapping in Outlook, or per-user access control. Mail routing rules in Google Admin are less granular than Exchange transport rules.

Bottom line: If your business runs on email and needs shared mailboxes, complex routing, or fine-grained delegation, Exchange has more depth. If your team wants a simple, fast email experience and does not need advanced mail flow, Gmail is easier to use and manage.

Office apps and documents

This is where the platforms diverge most visibly.

Microsoft 365 includes desktop versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook on Business Standard and Premium plans. These are the full desktop applications – Excel with pivot tables, Power Query, and VBA macros. Word with advanced formatting, mail merge, and reliable track changes. The web versions exist too but are still noticeably less capable for complex work.

Google Workspace includes Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Gmail – all browser-based. There are no desktop applications to install. Google’s apps are built for real-time collaboration. Multiple people editing the same document simultaneously works flawlessly. Version history is automatic and granular. The apps are lighter, faster to load, and have almost no learning curve.

The trade-off is capability. Google Sheets is not Excel. It handles basic spreadsheets well but falls short for complex financial models, large datasets, pivot table-heavy analysis, or anything involving macros. Google Docs works for most documents but struggles with complex formatting and print-oriented layouts. If your business creates documents that stay digital and are edited collaboratively, Google’s apps work well. If your team builds complex spreadsheets or handles documents from clients who use Word, the gap matters.

Bottom line: Google wins on real-time collaboration and simplicity. Microsoft wins on advanced functionality, especially in Excel and for businesses that exchange documents with clients and partners who use Office. If you pick Google and later discover you need Excel features, there is no upgrade path within Workspace – you would need to buy Office licenses separately.

File storage and sharing

Microsoft 365 provides OneDrive for personal storage (1 TB per user) and SharePoint for shared team storage. OneDrive syncs to your desktop, SharePoint backs every Teams channel, and the two integrate through the same sync client. The structure is powerful but has a learning curve. Understanding when to use OneDrive versus SharePoint is one of the first things businesses need to sort out, and getting it wrong leads to files stuck in personal storage that should be shared.

Google Workspace provides Google Drive with shared drives (formerly Team Drives) on Business Standard and above. Shared drives belong to the organization, not individual users, and files in them persist when employees leave. My Drive is personal storage, similar to OneDrive. Google Drive’s search is better than OneDrive’s for finding files by content. The sharing model is simpler – share a link, set permissions, done.

Storage varies by plan. Microsoft gives 1 TB per user on every business plan plus 1 TB shared pool for SharePoint. Google gives 30 GB per user on Starter, 2 TB on Standard, and 5 TB on Plus.

Bottom line: Google Drive is simpler to use and has better search. SharePoint is more powerful for structured file management and permissions but requires more setup. If you just need a place to store and share files, Google is easier. If you need document libraries, metadata, or complex permission hierarchies, SharePoint is the better foundation.

Video meetings and communication

Microsoft 365 includes Teams for chat, video meetings, and channels. Teams is a unified platform – chat, calls, meetings, files, and apps all live in one place. Meeting recording and transcription are available on Business Standard and above. Teams also supports PSTN calling (with add-on licenses), which means it can replace your phone system entirely.

Google Workspace includes Google Meet for video and Google Chat for messaging. Meet is clean and reliable for video calls. Chat has spaces (similar to channels) for team conversations. But Meet and Chat are separate products, not a unified experience like Teams. Meeting recording is available on Standard and above. Google Voice (an add-on) provides phone system capabilities similar to Teams Phone.

Bottom line: Teams is a more complete communications platform, especially if you want to consolidate chat, meetings, and phone into one tool. Google Meet is simpler and works well for businesses that mostly need video calls without the full communications suite.

Security and compliance

This is the area where the gap is most significant for businesses that handle sensitive data or need to meet compliance requirements.

Microsoft 365 Business Premium ($22/user/month) includes Defender for Office 365 (advanced email threat protection), Defender for Business (endpoint detection and response), Microsoft Intune (device management), Azure AD Premium P1 (conditional access), and data loss prevention policies. Conditional access lets you block logins from entire countries, require MFA on untrusted networks, and restrict access to compliant devices. Intune lets you enforce encryption, push policies, and remotely wipe lost devices. The security hardening you can do with Premium is substantial, and the licensing structure is designed so that security features scale with your plan tier.

Google Workspace includes endpoint management on all plans, with advanced features on Plus. Google’s approach to security is more automated and less configurable. Phishing and malware protection in Gmail uses machine learning models that are genuinely good. But Google does not offer the same granular control. There is no equivalent to conditional access with the depth of Entra ID. Context-aware access (Google’s version) exists on Plus but is less flexible. Google does not include endpoint detection and response (EDR) – you would need a third-party tool.

For compliance, Microsoft has a broader set of tools: sensitivity labels, information barriers, eDiscovery, communication compliance, and retention policies with legal hold. Google has eDiscovery through Google Vault and retention management, but the compliance toolset is narrower.

Bottom line: If your business is in healthcare, finance, legal, or any industry with compliance requirements, Microsoft 365 Premium provides more security and compliance controls out of the box. If your business needs basic, automated security without much hands-on configuration, Google’s built-in protections are solid and require less admin effort. But you have fewer levers to pull when you need fine-grained control.

Admin experience

Microsoft 365 Admin Center is powerful and complex. There are separate admin centers for Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, Intune, Entra ID, and Compliance – each with their own interface and settings. For an IT professional, this granularity is valuable. For a business owner who inherited admin access, it is overwhelming. The admin center guide we wrote exists specifically because the interface is not intuitive for non-technical admins.

Google Admin Console is a single interface for everything. User management, device management, security settings, app settings, and reporting all live in one place. It is easier to navigate, faster to learn, and less likely to leave you searching for where a specific setting lives. For small businesses without dedicated IT staff, Google’s admin experience has a lower barrier to entry.

Bottom line: Google is easier to manage if you do not have IT staff. Microsoft is more capable if you have someone (internal or external) who knows how to use the tools.

Pricing

Both platforms use per-user, per-month pricing with annual commitment discounts.

PlanMicrosoft 365Google Workspace
EntryBusiness Basic – $6/user/monthBusiness Starter – $7/user/month
Mid-tierBusiness Standard – $12.50/user/monthBusiness Standard – $14/user/month
Top tierBusiness Premium – $22/user/monthBusiness Plus – $18/user/month

The prices look close, but what is included at each tier is different. Microsoft’s mid-tier includes desktop Office apps. Google’s mid-tier does not include desktop apps (because they do not exist – everything is browser-based). Microsoft’s top tier includes a full security stack (Defender, Intune, conditional access). Google’s top tier includes enhanced endpoint management and Vault but not EDR or conditional access with the same depth.

A direct price comparison only works if you also compare what you would need to add. If you choose Google and need endpoint protection, you are buying a third-party EDR tool. If you choose Google and need desktop Office apps for client compatibility, you are buying Office licenses separately. The total cost of ownership is often closer than the sticker prices suggest.

Migration difficulty

Switching between platforms is not trivial, and this is worth considering before you commit.

Moving to Microsoft 365 from Google means migrating Gmail to Exchange, Google Drive to OneDrive/SharePoint, and converting Google Docs/Sheets/Slides to Office formats. Email migration is usually smooth – the Microsoft 365 native Google Workspace migration tool handles mail, calendar, and contacts; see how to migrate email to Microsoft 365 from an old Exchange server or Gmail for the Google-specific gotchas (calendar resources, shared drives, forwarding rules). File migration is where problems surface – Google Docs convert to .docx files, but complex formatting does not always survive. Sheets with Google-specific functions (IMPORTRANGE, GOOGLEFINANCE) break on conversion.

Moving to Google Workspace from Microsoft means migrating Exchange to Gmail, OneDrive/SharePoint to Drive, and converting Office documents. File migration from OneDrive is straightforward, but SharePoint sites with complex permission structures, metadata columns, or workflows do not have a clean migration path. Excel files with VBA macros, Power Query, or complex formulas may not work in Sheets.

In either direction, the pain is in files with platform-specific features and in retraining users who are accustomed to one platform’s way of doing things. The longer you are on a platform, the harder it is to leave, because your workflows, integrations, and institutional knowledge are all built around it.

Ecosystem and integrations

Microsoft 365 fits naturally into organizations that already use Windows, Active Directory, or Azure. The integration between M365, Entra ID, Intune, and Azure services is seamless. If your line-of-business applications integrate with Active Directory for authentication, staying in the Microsoft ecosystem simplifies identity management. Power Platform (Power Automate, Power BI, Power Apps) extends M365 with automation and reporting tools that are tightly integrated. The same M365 alignment is the deciding factor when picking an IaaS platform later – covered in Azure vs AWS for small business.

Google Workspace fits naturally into organizations that are already using Google services, Chrome-based workflows, or cloud-native tools. The integration with Google Cloud Platform, Chrome OS, and Android device management is strong. Google’s ecosystem is simpler with fewer moving parts.

Bottom line: Choose the ecosystem that matches your existing infrastructure. Switching ecosystems is harder than switching email providers.

Who should choose Microsoft 365

Microsoft 365 is the better fit if:

  • Your team needs desktop Office apps, especially Excel with advanced features
  • You exchange documents with clients, vendors, or partners who use Office
  • You need granular security controls – conditional access, Intune device management, endpoint detection
  • Your industry has compliance requirements (HIPAA, financial regulations, legal hold)
  • You want to consolidate email, chat, meetings, and phone into one platform with Teams
  • Your business already uses Windows and Active Directory
  • You need complex email features like shared mailboxes, transport rules, or mail flow control

Who should choose Google Workspace

Google Workspace is the better fit if:

  • Your team works primarily in a browser and does not need desktop Office apps
  • Real-time collaboration on documents is a core part of how you work
  • You want a simpler admin experience and do not have dedicated IT staff
  • Your documents stay internal and you do not frequently exchange formatted files with external parties
  • Your business is already built on Google services and Chrome
  • You want a platform that requires less configuration and management overhead
  • Your security needs are standard and do not require fine-grained policy control

The honest middle ground

Most small businesses will be fine on either platform. Both provide reliable email, decent collaboration tools, and enough storage. The decision usually comes down to two factors:

  1. Do you need desktop Office apps? If the answer is yes – because your team relies on Excel features, because your clients send Word documents, because your industry runs on Office formats – then Microsoft 365 is the practical choice. You can use Google Workspace and buy standalone Office licenses, but at that point you are paying for two platforms.
  1. Do you need advanced security controls? If your business handles sensitive data, has compliance obligations, or needs the ability to enforce device policies and conditional access, Microsoft 365 Business Premium provides these tools natively. Matching this security posture on Google Workspace requires third-party add-ons and a higher total cost.

If neither of these applies – if your team works in browsers, creates documents that stay internal, and your security needs are standard – Google Workspace is simpler, easier to manage, and slightly less expensive.

How Sequentur approaches this decision

We manage Microsoft 365 environments for most of our clients, and the reason is not brand loyalty. It is that the businesses we work with typically need desktop Office apps, exchange documents with external parties, and require the security controls that Business Premium provides. When we set up and manage M365 tenants, conditional access configuration is part of the baseline setup, and Defender and Intune deployments are projects we scope and roll out based on each client’s environment.

That said, we have recommended Google Workspace when it was the better fit, and we have helped businesses migrate between the two when they outgrew one platform.

If you are evaluating both platforms and want an honest assessment of which fits your needs, reach out through our contact page. We can walk through your specific requirements and help you make the decision before you are locked into a platform that does not fit.

Get the Best IT Support

Schedule a 15-minute call to see if we’re the right partner for your success.

Invalid Email
Invalid Number
Please check the captcha to verify you are not a robot.
Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Here is why you are going to love working with Sequentur

Need help?

FAQs About Our Managed IT Services